Since January, 2003

Ad by HillAds
 (a random before-and-after moment)
April 23, 2004
May 2, 2013
2nd (Mid) at I, Looking East-Southeast (see more)

It was a busy ANC 6D meeting on Monday night for Near Southeast-related issues, so I'm going to put it all in a series of posts:
* New Jersey Avenue Underpass Art: The Capitol Riverfront BID gave an update on the "Water Pylons" art installation, which is now moving forward after being "dormant" for about a year. This is the project partially funded by a grant from the DC Commission on Arts and Humanities that will paint and light the pylons holding up the Southeast Freeway in a "modern representation of water that announces New Jersey Avenue, SE as a gateway to the Capitol Riverfront community." The reflective blue paint should go up in July, followed by light fixtures in August, and the installation should be dedicated in September, which will be right around the time that DCCAH moves into its new nearby digs at 225 Virginia/200 I. Passers-by may note that new fences and LED overhead lighting have already been installed along New Jersey as part of the transformation of the underpass. The BID's presentation to the ANC, with more information about the project, is here.
* Parking Parking Parking: There was a discussion about issues with game-day parking in the neighborhood, specifically the prohibition of parking along K and L streets, as well as other restrictions that have made residents unhappy. Damon Harvey of DDOT says that the agency is "reassessing" the current configuration, to figure out how to provide better access to residents while not allowing stadium-goers to then hog all the parking. He expects that changes will be announced in a month or so that will allow for "greater residential protection during games." One other non-game day change for residents has already gone into effect: meters are now turned off at 6:30 pm (but still 10 pm on game days).
However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)
Also, in somewhat related news the ANC unanimously passed a resolution protesting the plan in the mayor's new budget to redirect most performance parking proceeds to other areas, such as Metro, rather than their being used as originally intended, to fund non-automotive transportation improvements in the neighborhood.
Comments (11)
 
 More About ANC News

JDLand.com Home

Comments

ZoolanderANDtheBoYz says: (5/15/12 10:39 AM)
What's the update on Canal Park Construction?


JD says: (5/15/12 10:44 AM)
That would be what I meant by "series of posts." Not able to get to all of it at once.


202_cyclist says: (5/15/12 11:07 AM)
The Atlantic Cities blog has a great article this morning about the Southeast waterfront neighborhood.

link


Boris says: (5/15/12 11:44 AM)
JD, did they give an "official" reason for this? I mean we all know the city cut some kind of deal with the developers, but what is City Hall saying about it?

"However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)"


JD says: (5/15/12 12:03 PM)
It's not a "deal with developers"--it's how parking is handled in a mixed-use area, to prevent every parking space from being perpetually taken by residents, meaning that businesses, restaurants, etc., would have little expectation of visitors being able to park. As I said, there are multiple big apartment buildings in the city where residents don't get RPP stickers. This was a position supported by Tommy Wells when the plans for ballpark-area parking were first laid out, btw.


Boris says: (5/15/12 1:20 PM)
Tommy Wells, wrong again? Say it isn't so. My point is (and then I'll shut up) that renters on or near 7th or 8th get stickers and the same argument could be made in those (commercial) areas of the Hill. And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area? Lastly, I personally don't want a sticker to park in our neighborhood. I want it to park in those areas of the Hill I can't walk to and have to pay for now. I'll stop now.


Parking4Us says: (5/15/12 2:33 PM)
Our area was built with substantial public and private parking available to ensure that the businesses in the area have visitor/high turnover spots available. It also has an immense amount of street parking available for residential parking. The city however has artificially reduced the number of parking spaces usable by residents in our area which burdens us disproportionately when compared to both existing and potential commercial entities. There probably is not a vast conspiracy between the city and the developers but it certainly does imply they are not paying attention to the REAL needs of the neighborhood as a whole. We want neighborhood visitors to come to the businesses in our area just like the surrounding areas (barracks row, eastern market, etc.) want us to visit theirs. Increasing zone 6 RPP will only increase that commerce in the larger SE, not hinder it. Non-neighborhood visitors will utilize the commercial lots and remaining metered parking anyway so this would not affect them.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:37 PM)
The only meaningful thing that would happen if they expanded RPP to the high rises is that people that live in Capitol Quarter* (and perhaps even some parts north of the highway when other high rises are built) would not have a place to park as they would be flooded with cars from the high rises. Now I am sure there are some examples somewhere, but I can not think of any areas in DC, Arlington, or any other locations which give high rises parking permits for zoned residential areas.

Parking4Us point about other parts of Zone 6 is actually an interesting one, but I imagine it would be quite an ordeal for the city to figure out zoning in that manner. For example, how do they zone so that person A can park in all of zone 6 be except for part 1 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 1) and person B can park in all of zone 6 except for part 2 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 2) and person C can park anywhere in Zone 6 b/c they are in a row house. All of this so you can drive to other parts of Zone 6?

In my opinion, if you live in an high rise, you should plan to secure parking through your building. If your building has a bad parking deal (looking at you Capitol Hill Towers), it is not the city's fault.

*Disclaimer, I do not live in Capitol Quarter.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:40 PM)
As for Boris's comment:

"And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area?"

It's also to lessen your need for a car.


JD says: (5/16/12 2:45 PM)
... And once you allow Ward 6 parking on more streets in the neighborhood, you'll suddenly find a whole lot more people from Ward 6 driving to baseball games, fighting for the spaces as well. That's one of the reasons that Capitol Quarter people can have trouble finding street parking during games. (It's an issue that the streets just across South Capitol in SW deal with, along with people handing out their Ward 6 guest parking pass to ballpark-goers--all of which takes away parking from residents.)



PJY03 says: (5/16/12 6:27 PM)
We're arguing over two separate things here. Its fairly obvious that there's never going to be enough Zone 6 parking for resident's of high rise buildings to rely on it as their primary parking resource. Even if they opened up a lot more zone 6 parking, you'd have to be out of your mind thinking you could reasonably count on this to meet your residential parking needs. This is why I bought a garage space in my building. You need one if you live here.

So the quantity of parking isn't the issue. I could care less whether they increase the number of zone 6 parking spots available in the neighborhood. I just want the right to the same damn sticker every other tax payer of the ward has. How hard is that? If they have the theoretical right to park in my neighborhood, I should have the right to park in theirs. Its not about opening up more spaces for zone 6 residential parking. Its about treating residents of high rises fairly.

The market will allocate the limited number of spaces efficiently on its own. But you have to treat all city residents fairly.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed

See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Top News
  
Recent Comments:  
Jaybird on Details on The: "Speak softly, and carry a big stick."
ValveetaChz on Arris and Lofts/Capitol: I agree with JES. I am in love with the renderings of Arris and can't wait to se...
conngs0 on Details on The: I'm excited to try the place out whenever it opens. And I give Mr. Ross credit ...
JES on Arris and Lofts/Capitol: I don't know what it is, but I still just love the Arris architectural design. C...



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
1200 B/O 1ST ST SE   THEFT
 11/21/14
900 B/O 5TH ST SE   BURGLARY
 11/21/14
200 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
 11/21/14
1200 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
 11/20/14
900 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/17/14
700 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
 11/16/14
300 B/O I ST SE   ASSAULT W/DANGEROUS WEAPON
 11/15/14
4TH & TINGEY ST SE   THEFT
 11/13/14
UNIT B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/12/14
100 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
 11/10/14
200 B/O VIRGINIA AVE SE   ROBBERY
 11/09/14
900 B/O M ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/09/14
9TH & L ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/07/14
11TH & M ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/07/14
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/07/14
1000 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/07/14
50 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
 11/05/14
400 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 11/03/14
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 10/29/14
3RD & L ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 10/28/14

Active Public Space Permits Archive  
1331 2ND ST SE    Carlton Ray 
Assigned
paving; streetfixture; excavation  
 02/10/14
to
02/09/15
1331 4TH ST SE    Forest City Forest City 
Issued
excavation; new  
 01/10/14
to
02/10/15

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1277 1ST ST SE   
11/21/14 
BALLPARK SQUARE LLC A DELAWARE LLC / DENNIS CONSULTING
SH1400051 / CONSTRUCTION
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PERIMETER CONTROL EXCAVATION SHEETING & SHORING AND ASSOCIATED UTILITIES.
1331 2ND ST SE   
11/13/14 
DC WATER
SB1400419 / CONSTRUCTION
TYPE OF WELL(S):OBSERVATION WELLS INCLINOMETERS VW PIEZOMETERS AND EXTENSOMETERS FOR UPGRADE OF DC WATER CLEAN RIVERS PROJECT DIVISION I. NUMBER OF WELL(S):112. DEPTH OF WELL(S):UP TO 60 FT. DIAMETER OF WELL(S): 6". DRILLING METHOD: CASED AND HSA. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED WORKPLAN.
1331 4TH ST SE   
11/26/14 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / DONALD V. ELLENBERGER
M1500519 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1000 5TH ST SE   
11/25/14 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / JOSEPH M MAGNOLIA
P1501521 / SUPPLEMENTAL
200 I ST SE   
11/24/14 
HASSAN DEPT. OF GENERAL SERVICES
PC24903284 / POST CARD
INTERIOR DEMOLITION OF NON-BEARING ELEMENTS IN A SPACE UP TO 5 000 SQUARE FEET (464.5 SQUARE METERS)
   
11/24/14 
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES DC / DEPT OF GENERAL DC
PC43136454 / POST CARD
INSTALLATION OF NOT MORE THAN 10 NEW OUTLETS AND NOT MORE THAN 10 NEW LIGHTING FIXTURES FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT.
332 K ST SE   
11/10/14 
KRISTIN L HENRIKSON / JOHN A. TETI
E1501053 / SUPPLEMENTAL
80 M ST SE   
11/12/14 
WELLS REIT II 80 M STREET LLC / RONNIE E WRIGHT
E1501089 / SUPPLEMENTAL
20 M ST SE   
11/21/14 
SOUTH EAST REALTY LLC SOUTH EAST REALTY LLC / ADOLPHUS SIMMONS; SOUTH EAST REAL SOUTH EAST REALTY LLC; ADOLPHUS SIMMONS
P92093458 / SUPPLEMENTAL
80 M ST SE   
11/21/14 
VEIC EXPANSION / DAVID RAINE; VEIC EXPANSION; DAVID RAINE
P77248641 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
11/22/14 
NICHOLAS DODD / NICHOLAS DODD; NICHOLAS DODD; NICHOLAS DODD
E45845237 / SUPPLEMENTAL
901 M ST SE   
11/13/14 
CARLTON RAY
AH1500084 / CONSTRUCTION
TO PERFORM TEMPORARY LANE CLOSURES
1201 M ST SE   
11/13/14 
CARLTON RAY
AH1500085 / CONSTRUCTION
TO PERFORM TEMPORARY LANE CLOSURES
75 N ST SE   
11/26/14 
CRANE SERVICE CO / CHRISTINE LONG
AH1500133 / CONSTRUCTION
AN AFTER HOURS PERMIT IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED FROM 2:00AM THRU 11:59PM
801 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
11/12/14 
GREYSTAR / JOHN MORIARTY AND ASSOC.
F1500068 / CONSTRUCTION
INSTALL A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SITE FENCE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. FENCE TO BE 6' HIGH ON BLOCK SUPPORTS.
880 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
11/19/14 
880 NEW JERSEY AVENUE LLC / OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
EN1500172 / SHOP DRAWING
TYPE OF ELEVATOR : ONE (1) TRACTION / CENTRAL / VERTICAL TRANSPOTATION
   
11/20/14 
BAKER DC / CHRISTINE LONG
AH1500122 / CONSTRUCTION
AN AFTER HOURS PERMIT IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED FROM 12:01 AM THRU11:59 PM
1100 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
11/10/14 
SQUARE 742 LLC / ELMUBARK E. ELNAHAS
E1501060 / SUPPLEMENTAL
125 O ST SE   
11/14/14 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOREST CITY WASHINGTON / JOPATRIC AMERICODE
SB1400418 / CONSTRUCTION
EIGHT SOIL BORINGS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. FOREST CITY F1 BLOCK CINEMA BORINGS SHALL BE 10 INCH DIAMETER MUD ROTARY METHOD; 2 SHALL BE DRILLED TO A DEPTH OF 100 FEET AND 6 TO A DEPTH OF 60 FEET; IF THE CONFINING UNIT IS ENCOUNTERED DURING DRILLING THEN ADVANCEMENT OF THE AUGERS SHOULD BE HALTED AND THE PERMANENT OUTER CASING SHOULD BE SET INTO 10 FEET (IF THE CONFINING UNIT IS THINNER THAN 10FT OUTER...
25 POTOMAC AVE SE   
11/10/14 
BARR CONCRETE
TC1500004 / CONSTRUCTION
TOWERCRANE FOR JOBSITE USE
810 POTOMAC AVE SE   
11/26/14 
810 POTOMAC AVE SE HOLDINGS LLC
B1501997 / CONSTRUCTION
DEMO EXISTING WINDOWS AND REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOWS THAT COMPLY WITH HISTORIC PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS
921 POTOMAC AVE SE   
11/20/14 
PAUL A GHIOTTO / MURRAY LYONS
P1501384 / SUPPLEMENTAL
300 TINGEY ST SE   
11/24/14 
FC BOILERMAKER LLC / MATT LOSIGNOR
P1501478 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
11/12/14 
FC BOILERMAKER LLC / FRED LATIMORE
E1501087 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
11/22/14 
FC BOILERMAKER LLC / GREGORY BIRCKHEAD; FC BOILERMAKER LLC; MICHAEL BELL
E55526822 / SUPPLEMENTAL
401 TINGEY ST SE   
11/20/14 
FOREST CITY / FVI 2020
SB1500055 / CONSTRUCTION
EXTENSION TO WORK IN REFERENCE WITH PERMIT SB1200282. SECOND EXTENSION FROM 10.25.14 TO 4.25.15
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
CUSHING PL   09/11/14
$ 9,000,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
HALF ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
N ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
CUSHING PL   09/11/14
$ 9,000,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
N ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
N ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
HALF STREET RESIDENTIAL PJV LLC
 
HALF ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
MR BP RESIDENTIAL #1A LLC
 
N ST   09/11/14
$ 12,500,000
MR BP RESIDENTIAL #1A LLC
 


Project Directory




Blog/Home
Project Directory
Photo Archive
Event Photos
 
Nats Park
Food Map
What's New
History

 
Demolished Buildings
Historic Photos
Satellite Images
Timeline
 
About JDLand
Message JD
Advertise
Photo Use
 
     © Copyright 2014 JD.