Since January, 2003 (and April 2015)

Ad by Google
 (a random before-and-after moment)
September 19, 2004
May 26, 2013
3rd at I, Looking South-Southwest (see more)

Earlier this week the Federal Highway Administration and DDOT gave notice that the in-process National Environmental Policy Act study of CSX's Virginia Avenue Tunnel project will be switching mid-stream from an Environmental Assessment to a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement study.
Since the outcome of an EA is often the instigation of an EIS, this is probably serving mainly to speed up the process and get started on an EIS that most likely would have been needed anyway. The NEPA web site mentions that "[i]f a federal agency anticipates that an undertaking may significantly impact the environment, or if a project is environmentally controversial, a federal agency may choose to prepare an EIS without having to first prepare an EA," both of which would certainly seem to be ways this project could be described.
If you want to see how extensive an EIS can be, check out the ones completed for the 11th Street Bridges reconstruction and the planned South Capitol Street corridor improvements.
The information already gathered and feedback already garnered during the EA process will be incorporated into the EIS. CSX representatives tell me that they expect the switch to add about six months to the environmental review process, and the project's web site now has a Spring 2013 date listed for the Final EIS/record of decision. CSX has always wanted the project to be done in 2015, to coincide with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal, but that timeline is starting to look a bit dicey given that construction has been expected to take 2-3 years.
The public meeting to unveil the chosen "alternative" designs that the EIS is studying is currently being planned. You can read my write-up from the last meeting to see more about the initial group of concept designs, which ranged from expanding the tunnel to building a separate parallel tunnel to leaving the tunnel untouched to closing it and having CSX reroute all their traffic rerouting the double-stack traffic and through traffic out of the city (UPDATED to fix my mistake--there is no proposal that would close the tunnel altogether). (It probably isn't hard to guess which alternatives are preferred by the Capitol Quarter Homeowners Association, with CQ's homes on Virginia Avenue standing mere feet away from any construction.) UPDATE: It's been requested that I mention that, while the CQ HoA letter above lists a group of possible signatories, at least three of them (ANC 6B, Barracks Row Main Street, and the Committee of 100) have all already voted against co-signing the letter.
For those blissfully unaware of this project (I wish!), CSX is needing to expand the 105-year-old tunnel that runs beneath Virginia Avenue between 2nd and 12th streets, SE so that a second track can be added and double-height cars can be accommodated. With initial plans calling for the extended closure of Virginia Avenue and a temporary track in an open trench to run trains through during construction, residents on both sides of the freeway have been greatly concerned about how the work will be designed and carried out, which then spurred DDOT to request a formal environmental review (despite this being a project being carried out by a private entity on a right-of-way that they own some of).
My pile of posts over the past few years on the subject may also be enlightening, or may not.
UPDATE: This flyer just posted on the VirginiaAvenueTunnel.com web site says that the next public meeting, announcing which concepts will be looked at in the EIS, is scheduled for May 21 from 6 to 8 pm at Nationals Park.
Comments (14)
 
 More About CSX/Virginia Ave. Tunnel

JDLand.com Home

Comments

Alex B. says: (5/3/12 9:25 AM)
I completely understand the reasoning of the CQ neighbors (to a degree - construction impact, sure; but operational impact of increased train traffic in a tunnel? I don't buy it), but they do realize they're favoring the $4+ billion alternative, right?


MJM says: (5/3/12 9:38 AM)
Let's not forget the tracks have been there for 100+ years and a super majority of CQ residents knew CSX was planning construction but they signed on the ......line


Shogungts says: (5/3/12 12:15 PM)
Forgive me for my ignorance of railways and if this was mentioned elsewhere, but what does DC get out of this? Do they get some type of usage fee/toll for every train that comes through? What is the incentive for DC to allow CSX to build out the tunnel? Higher tolls, just keeping them from leaving DC altogether?


Gladiator says: (5/3/12 8:36 PM)
Yes, there does not appear to be ANYTHING for DC in this deal. While DC appears to have driven a hard bargain (perhaps too hard) with Whole Foods, e.g., there was at least some clear benefit to the city from having a Whole Foods in Near SE. But while everyone would have to acknowledge that there will be many detrimental impacts to DC of a CSX tunnel project -- the question is only just how MASSIVE will be the scale of the damage to DC economically, environmentally, etc. -- the only gains discussed for the District are promises from CSX of how they will plant a few trees or something in the aftermath of the damage left in the wake of this project.

While the alternatives may involve entail significant expense to CSX, its not clear why DC should care, any more than CSX cares about the impact their proposal would have on the District. This is really a question of how much market share of the NE corridor freight CSX will get, relative to its competitors. Why should DC care if CSX competitors are advantaged because CSX is unable to avail itself of the lowest cost/highest damage alternative for moving its freight through the region?


Gladiator says: (5/3/12 8:43 PM)
Interesting that even though EYA has stated that they did not know about the CSX project until the end of 2010, MJM thinks that a "supermajority" of CQ residents knew CSX was planning construction when they bought their homes.......So they knew something that the people selling them the houses did not know (and certainly did not disclose, as they more recently began to do to potential buyers)??


JD says: (5/3/12 8:50 PM)
No, it was late summer 2009: link While some of the Virginia Avenue houses were still being sold. I know because I talked with some people who were wanting to know more about the tunnel project before buying.


JD says: (5/3/12 8:55 PM)
And, if we go to the photo archive, we can see it was February/March 2010 when the Virginia Avenue homes started getting built: link


BillP says: (5/4/12 9:10 AM)
As part of the NEPA process, CSX posed all of those as legitimate alternatives. Therefore, it is my understanding that the CQ HOA chose to support all of the non-invasive alternatives as its initial position. By moving from the EA to the EIS and as part of the NEPA process, this list of alternatives will be narrowed and modified and so the CQ HOA will obviously modify its position in accordance with the new alternatives.

While I would not presume to speak for the HOA board or all CQ homeowners, many of us feel that some type of tunnel construction is inevitable and we would simply like to mitigate these circumstances so that the worst case but very real scenario does not come to fruition - freight trains running through a completely open tunnel, only a few feet from some homes, that separates much of the near SE neighborhood from points north for three years or more.


Bob says: (5/4/12 9:36 AM)
CQ residents have told me that CSX told them at the first community meeting about the project that CSX didn't even know there were houses there. This would be a great issue for Tommy Wells to oppose. He could re-do Marion Barry's opposition to freeways running through the middle of DC in the '60s. Instead of "No White man's highways through Black man's bedrooms", Tommy could do "No corporate train tracks through gentrifriers front yards." Not as catchy, but it could work.


Alex B. says: (5/4/12 10:06 AM)
@Shogungts:

<i>What is the incentive for DC to allow CSX to build out the tunnel? Higher tolls, just keeping them from leaving DC altogether?</i>

There is no incentive. DC has little leverage. While the right of way is public, CSX (as most railroads do) have very strong legal rights of access via perpetual easements. This makes sense, as if you were running a railroad, it wouldn't be possible to operate if suddenly someone decided they wanted to remove your tracks.

Railroad rights of way vary, either from easements to outright ownership. I'm not sure exactly where this falls, but what is known is that:

a) CSX has the right to operate trains there,
b) they have the right to improve that right-of-way,
c) they are offering to do it with their own money.

Those three things means that, practically, DC has little leverage at all. They can't force CSX to go elsewhere. Perhaps they could provide an incentive to do so, but as I noted, the alternative is a $4+ billion bypass of the DC area. I think CSX's early cost estimates to re-do this tunnel were on the order of $150 million. That's quite a gap to make up.

Furthermore, this is a project of national importance. This and the rail bottlenecks in Baltimore are key elements of the entire east coast freight rail network. The required geometry of railcars, combined with the geography of the east coast and the hills of the fall line, plus the water bodies of the Chesapeake Watershed mean that there are only a few viable options for where tracks can go. Building a bypass isn't like directing trucks to just take another highway.

GGW posted on this a few years back:
link


Andrew in DC says: (5/4/12 12:55 PM)
@Alex B.
"a) CSX has the right to operate trains there,
b) they have the right to improve that right-of-way,
c) they are offering to do it with their own money. "

The greatest issue I have is with point "b". While they do have the right to improve their existing tunnel, the law which provided the B&O the right to dig the tunnel in the first place did not allow for trench work beyond the 5th year past the passage of the law. Nor were temporary tracks permitted at all, for that matter. CSX's proposed plans are in violation of each of these.

Further, CSX's "preferred" alternative requests a significant expansion of the ROW than B&O utilized. Since B&O did not use it, and was, by law, restricted from digging it back up to use it, a case could clearly be made that they forfeited the "full" ROW established in the law, and therefore CSX only inherits the ROW currently in use.

So please, by all means, CSX has the right to improve on their ROW... so long as they abide by the restrictions set out for them.


Gladiator says: (5/5/12 10:01 AM)
JD -

Yes, it was indeed the end of 2009 (not 2010) when EYA claims they were first made aware of the project. But that was still after the fact (and yes, there were a couple of stray news reports before then, but EYA itself is on the record in writing saying they only became aware of the project near the very end of 2009).

What CSX or EYA is not going to tell you is that most Virginia Ave home-owners had to put down huge deposits well before that time. And of course many other CQ homes as well. What you seem to be ignoring is that the VA Ave homeowners were required to put down very large deposits well in advance of when their homes were actually built. THey then faced a Hobson's choice of losing tens of thousands of dollars by walking away, or having a tunnel dug through their front yard.


MJM says: (5/6/12 2:34 PM)
8 May 2008 - CSX released a vague press release that something was going to happen here in DC in the near future - so I have a feeling EYA is being less than truthful about when they really knew what was happening. Its kinda like moving next to an airport and complaining about the noise or future expansion?

link


Alex B. says: (5/8/12 9:21 AM)
Andrew,

There have been decades of legal precedent concerning rail rights of way - I don't think DC would be breaking any new ground by opposing this project.

I don't know how wide their ROW is, but I doubt it's limited to the tunnel alone. Rail ROWs are often far wider than just the tracks themselves.

Those restrictions are all well and good, but again: this is a project of national importance. I don't think the concerns of neighbors give them a right to veto this project. Their concerns should be addressed, of course.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed

See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 

JDLand.com's Official Unofficial Guide, Updated for 2015!
 Top News
  
Recent Comments:  
Sally M on Notices of Virginia: Working beautifully for me. Count me in on the cult following…
conngs0 on Notices of Virginia: Works well for me. Thanks for the persistence with the technical issues associa...
JD on Notices of Virginia: We'll see what happens once there's actually some heavy traffic, but at the mome...
nairobs on Notices of Virginia: Works great for me too.



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
   THEFT
Theft 2 (Theft F/Building)
 04/23/15
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 04/22/15
1000 B/O 3RD ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 04/20/15
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 04/12/15
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 04/10/15
100 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2 (Theft F/Building)
 04/10/15
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 04/08/15
50 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 04/07/15
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
Theft From Auto 1
 04/04/15
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Shoplifting
 04/03/15
0 B/O POTOMAC AVE SE   ROBBERY
Robbery/Attempt To Commit Robbery
 03/28/15

Active Public Space Permits Archive  
1401 11TH ST SE    Maryland Transit Administration 
Issued
new  
 12/30/14
to
12/29/15
861 NEW JERSEY AVE SE    CSX Transportation Inc. 
Assigned
paving; excavation  
 01/09/15
to
10/09/15
1100 NEW JERSEY AVE SE    Capitol Riverfront BID 
Issued
streetfixture; new  
 08/19/14
to
08/18/15

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1011 1ST ST SE   
04/20/15 
COLIN CLARK / MICHAEL BIANCO; COLIN CLARK; MITCH PERMUY
E98099105 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1265 1ST ST SE   
04/10/15 
CAPITAL RIVERFRONT HOTEL LLC / JERONE SCOTT
P1504925 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/10/15 
BIT INVESTMENT FIFTY-EIGHT LLC / OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
EN1501330 / SHOP DRAWING
TYPE OF ELEVATOR : TWO (2) TRACTION / STEEL / CENTRAL / VERTICAL TRANSPOTATION LICENSE NUMBER : ELC1300386 ISSUE DATE : 08 / 04 / 2014 EXPIRATION DATE 11-30-2015
1277 1ST ST SE   
04/15/15 
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC / CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
AH1500366 / CONSTRUCTION
ON-SITE PROJECT WORK AND TRUCK DELIVERY HOURS 6:00AM - 7:00PM MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FOR THE PROJECT DURATION AND THE FOLLOWING HOLIDAYS: EMANCIPATION DAY 4 / 16 / 15 COLUMBUS DAY 10 / 12 / 15 VETERANS DAY 11 / 11 / 15
1331 4TH ST SE   
04/17/15 
CLARK CONCRETE
AH1500371 / CONSTRUCTION
AFTERHOURS TO POUR CONCRETE ON ROOF FROM 4 / 20 / 2015 TO 5 / 20 / 2015 FROM 7PM TO 7AM
   
04/21/15 
FC 1331 LLC / JAMES G HOLT
E1505081 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1150 5TH ST SE   
04/09/15 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY LUKER QUINN EVANS ARCHITECTS / REBECCA RUSCHMA ECS MID-ATLANTIC
SB1500233 / CONSTRUCTION
WE WILL PERFORM A TOTAL OF TWO SOIL BORINGS ON THE PROPOSED SITE AND ONE AUGER PROBE BORING FOR INFILTRATION TESTING. ONE BORING WILL EXTEND TO A DEPTH OF 100 FEET AND THE ANOTHER WILL EXTEND TO A DEPTH OF 15 FEET BELOW EXISTING SITE GRADES AND WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTY. WE WILL ALSO DRILL ONE PROBE BORING OFFSET FROM THE 15 FOOT BORING TO A DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 1...
   
04/15/15 
DGS DCPS / BRUCE PAIGE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
B1506192 / CONSTRUCTION
REPLACE EXISTING INOPERABLE GENERAC GENERATOR WITH A NEW 6.7L GENERAC GENERATOR
1015 HALF ST SE   
04/11/15 
HALF ST SE LLC / ANDREW ARNTSON; HALF ST SE LLC; ANDREW ARNTSON
P63100436 / SUPPLEMENTAL
55 M ST SE   
04/14/15 
HINES GLOBAL REIT / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
TL1500090 / CONSTRUCTION
FIRST TIME TENANT CONSTRUCTION FOR NEW OFFICE SPACE ON THE 9TH FLOOR FINCANTIERI MARINE GROUP AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED MECH. PLUMB. ELECT. FIRE PROTECTION AND ARCH. PLANS BY KTA GROUP. INTERIOR WORK ONLY. NO CHANGE IN USE.
   
04/15/15 
HINES GLOBAL REIT / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
TL1500077 / CONSTRUCTION
TENANT LAYOUT TO CONSTRUCTION NEWTHIRD FLOOR OFFICE SPACE FOR GREAT MINDS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED MECH. PLUMB. ELECT. FIRE PROTECTION AND ARCH. DWGS. BY KTA. INTERIOR WORK ONLY NO STRUCTURAL WORK INVOLVED.
   
04/17/15 
HINES GLOBAL REIT 55 M STREET LLC /
P1505068 / SUPPLEMENTAL
80 M ST SE   
04/20/15 
WELLS REIT II 80 M STREET LLC / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
B1503697 / CONSTRUCTION
RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING 5TH FLOOR OFFICE SPACE FOR TASC PHASE I AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED MECH. PLUMB. ELECT. FIRE PROTECTION DEMOLITION AND ARCH. DWGS. BY KTA. INTERIOR WORK ONLY. NO STRUCTURAL WORK INVOLVED. NO CHANGE IN USE.
50 M ST SE   
04/07/15 
KCG 50 M LLC / FVI2020
B1501877 / CONSTRUCTION
A NEW 11 STORY AND PENTHOUSE LEVEL HOTEL WITH 195 ROOMS INCLUDING 766 SQ-FT FUNCTION ROOM 2ND FLOOR AND 4874 SQ-FT OF GENERAL RETAIL USE ON THE 1ST FLOOR. THE BUILDING WILL HAVE 2 BELOW GRADE PARKING LEVELS TO ACCOMODATE REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE PARKING. LOADING IS ACCOMODATED AT THE 1ST FLOOR.
80 M ST SE   
04/21/15 
WELLS REIT II 80 M STREET LLC / RONNIE E WRIGHT
E1505080 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/21/15 
NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE / NEIL NUTWELL; NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE; NEIL NUTWELL
P84507258 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/21/15 
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN / PATRICK BARRON; UNKNOWN UNKNOWN; ROBIN MALLEY
E38207212 / SUPPLEMENTAL
300 M ST SE   
04/21/15 
NA NA NA
EHOP1290001 / HOME OCCUPATION
1201 M ST SE   
04/09/15 
COPT / EVAN O'BRIEN/ D MCKEEVER SERVICES
B1505061 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR RENOVATION ONLY TO BATHROOMS ON FLOORS 1-4.
909 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
04/07/15 
909 NEW JERSEY AVENUE ACQUISITION LLC / SHAW HERGENRATHER
P1504830 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
04/08/15 
JBG/FEDERAL CENTER LLC / JOHN MCDONALD
P1504842 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1000 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
04/07/15 
PHILIP BROWN
PC93167082 / POST CARD
REPLACEMENT OF NOT MORE THAN 1 GAS APPLIANCE ON A RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT.
   
04/13/15 
CAPITOL HILL TOWER HOUSING COOPERATIVE INCF / BRIAN DENNIS
P1504947 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1500 SOUTH CAPITOL ST SE   
04/06/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONALS STADIUM LLC / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
B1503799 / CONSTRUCTION
RENOVATIONS FOR NATIONALS NEW TEAM STORE LOCATED AT THE EAST GARAGE CONCOURSE AND 400 LEVELS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED MECHANICAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL FIRE PROTECTION DEMOLITION ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DWGS. BY ECS MID-ATLANTIC LLC.
   
04/06/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONALS STADIUM LLC / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
B1505076 / CONSTRUCTION
RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING CONCESSION STAND LOCATED ON THE 300 LEVEL OF NATS PARK STAND 310 NATIONALS PIZZA AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED MECH. PLUMB. ELECT. FIRE PROTECTION AND ARCH. DWGS. BY ECS MID-ATLANTIC LLC. NO CHANGE IN USE NO STRUCTURAL WORK INVOLVED.
   
04/07/15 
NATIONALS STADUIM / RANDAL COX; NATIONALS STADUIM; RANDAL COX
E37461133 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/08/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONAL STADIUM LIC. / DAVID C. WILLIAMS
E1504771 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/09/15 
JOHN GIUSEPPE / PHIL HAUHN; JOHN GIUSEPPE; PHILIP HAUHN
E19554829 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/15/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONALS STADIUM LLC / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
B1506296 / CONSTRUCTION
REVISION TO BLDG. PERMIT B1503799 NEW TEAM STORE AT NATIONALS PARK AS PER THE ATTACHED THIRD PARTY REVIEWED AND APPROVED REVISED MECH. PLUMB. ELECT. FIRE PROTECTION AND ARCH. PLANS BY ECS MID ATLANTIC LLC. ORIGINAL APPROVED PLAN SET ATTACHED ALONG WITH WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES MADE.
   
04/17/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONAL STADIUM LLC / DOMINIC E TOTARO
M1501639 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/17/15 
WASHINGTON NATIONALS STADIUM / STEPHEN J. EXELBERT
P1505092 / SUPPLEMENTAL
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
1022 - 1109 M ST SE   03/27/15
$ 5,000,000
WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
 
9TH ST SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
POTOMAC AV SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
POTOMAC AV SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
POTOMAC AV SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
1103 9TH ST SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
1105 9TH ST SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
816 POTOMAC AVE SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
0819R L ST SE   03/03/15
$ 3,730,000
818 POTOMAC AVENUE SE LLC
 
1201 HALF ST SE   02/19/15
$ 9,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL II LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0038 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0036 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
R N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0030 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0032 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1275 HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
M ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 


Project Directory




     © Copyright 2015 JD.